A. Yost and Co. can use the defense of Contributory Negligence. Lauren Yost suggested that counting inventory at different locations on different days is highly desirable. The president discarded Yost’s recommendation by signing a statement that states that no other method was practical, thus contributing to the failures.
B. Lauren Yost and Co. have no duty to any third-party. Their defense should be Lack of duty defense.
C. Yost would be successful in her defense against the client, Stuart Supply Company. It is the company responsibility for implementing sufficient internal controls. When . . .
Premium content. Our algorithm keeps content appearing here HIDDEN. You can share a few of your files in order to gain access to all of the library for FREE - with MANY perks as well: over HERE . Alternatively, a nominal payment of $7 for a monthly membership (or as low as $5 for the annual option) is your recourse HERE . We basically pay all of the membership back in terms of rewards/freebies :)
Already a member? Log in!